Reports

Report on 2022 EH Lecture (2) 2022/5/30
Report by Lin, Yu-hsuan, assistant of the Environmental History Group in the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

Prohibition of the Use of Bituminous Coal: Air Pollution from Coal Burning and Smoke Prevention Effort in Taiwan during Japanese Colonial and Early Post-war Period
禁用生煤:日治到戰後初期的燃煤空污與防煙行動

The second environmental history lecture in 2022 was given by Sheng-Kai Hsu (徐聖凱), the postdoctoral fellow in the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica. Dr. Hsu has studied public recreation during the Japanese colonial period in Taiwan. Lately, he turned his focus on air pollution when Taiwan was in the process of industrialization and modernization.

Coal became novel energy in the early 20th century in Taiwan. After the coal mining industry was developed in northern Taiwan, coal was massively used in cooking, transportation and factories, causing serious air pollution in the cities. Interestingly, the dark smoke and ash from burning coals were not considered pollution or something harmful at the very beginning of the application of this energy.

People complained about dirt, but it was only until the middle of the 1910s that they appealed to control air pollution by prohibiting the use of bituminous coal (生煤, 煙煤, 生石炭), a cheap fuel widely applied by many Taiwanese. The movements of preventing soot (煙害防止運動) were launched in 1923, 1927 and 1932, following the global trend of smoke control and calling for replacing bituminous coals with black coals. The movements were started in the residential areas of Taiwanese, such as Dadaocheng (大稻埕) and Wanhua (萬華), and expanded to other areas in Taipei, Taoyuan and even Keelung. The movement reached a certain achievement. However, the dark smoke from burning coal diffused in the cities again in the early post-war period because of the increasing production and consumption of coal caused by the population explosion. Not until gasoline became the main energy in Taiwan, did coal smoke truly disappear.

Dr. Hsu argued that instead of eliminating coal smoke, the smoke prevention efforts only turned the air pollution into invisible harm. It doesn’t mean that people completely neglected pollution control. In fact, they had a different imagination and cognition of air pollution from recent views. By epitomizing the history of the movements for preventing soot, Dr. Hsu provided a more diverse perspective on the relation between humans and their pollution.

 

Report on 2022 EH Lecture (1) 2022/3/28
Report by Lin, Yu-hsuan, assistant of the Environmental History Group in the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

Colonial Botany: Its Establishment in Taiwan and Historical Explanation
殖民地植物學:在臺灣的建立及其解釋

The first environmental history lecture in 2022 was given by Szu Wei Tsai(蔡思薇), adjunct assistant professor in the Graduate Institute of Taiwan History, National Cheng Chi University. Professor Tsai studies the history of botany in Taiwan during the Japanese colonial period by analyzing archives and exploring the stories behind plant specimens collected by Japanese botanists. Botany was a prevailing academic discipline in the 19th and 20th century. Plants in the colonies were investigated and categorized. Those resources that had potential to bring profit had to be explored. Hence, many scholars have been concentrating on the history of exploring and utilizing specific plants.

Professor Tsai has different views towards plants and botany. She argued that plants were also connected with national identity. In the eyes of Japanese botanists, the development of botany in Japan was far behind the “western world”. Most plant specimens were collected and stored by western botanists, indicating that when Japanese botanists were researching plants in Japanese territories, they had to swallow their pride and rely on western scholars, who may not want to help their opponents in the scientific competition at that time. As a result, with eagerness to supplement the database of botanical knowledge, Ryokichi Yatabe (矢田部良吉), the first Japanese botanist in the Tokyo Imperial University (東京帝國大學), called for collection of plant specimens around Japan.

The pressing desire of advancing botany in Japan also led to botanical surveys in Taiwan soon after Taiwan became the first colony of Japan. The first survey was conducted by scholars from different departments in the Tokyo Imperial University from 1896 to 1899. Although it did not reach any impressive achievement because of the unorganized tours of exploration and resistance from the locals, it was still a “good start” for researchers. From 1905 to 1921, the officials of Government-General of Taiwan — such as Kawakami Takiya (川上瀧彌), school teachers and volunteering collators undertook the second survey, which was much more efficient and organized than the first one. Before 1910, this survey was named a survey of useful plants (有用植物調查), but it has no huge difference from its continuing work, survey of plants in Taiwan (臺灣植物調查). Investigators did not only focus on plants that could be used, but those that could regularly appear in daily life.

The results of the survey can be read in Catalogue of Plants in Taiwan and The Illustration of Plants in Taiwan. The first catalogue collects 2,369 plants with their scientific names and names in Japanese as well as other local languages being recorded. Various plants at different altitudes were found and the collected plants in the catalogues were 1,000 more than the collection done by a British botanist. The Illustration of Plants in Taiwan is a series of catalogue written by botanist Bunzo Hayata (早田文藏). He published one volume each year from 1911 to 1921. His diligence shows that Japanese botanists attempted to break the academic hegemony of the western colonizers by publishing “unknown” plants of Japan’s new colony.

Professor Tsai believed that the botanical surveys conducted by the Japanese certainly not only served the purpose of exploring sources and legitimizing colonial dominance, but also had the intention of reaching academic independence and gaining national confidence. In short, besides glorifying and strengthening the colonial empire, the botanical study in Taiwan was beneficial to the development of academic research, establishing scientific foundation, and investigating local knowledge in Taiwan.

 

Report on 2021 EHLecture (2) 2021/8/6
Report by Lin, Yu-hsuan, assistant of the Environmental History Group in the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

From Island to Island: Tashiro Yasusada’s Research Surveys in the Pacific and Theory of Tropical Development in the Early Japanese Colonial Taiwan
從島至島:田代安定太平洋調查與日治初期臺灣熱帶發展論

The second EH lecture in 2021 was given by Wei-Chi Chen 陳偉智(Assistant Research Fellow in the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica). This lecture is a sequel to the first lecture this year, Horticulture and the Creation of Tropical Taiwan. It focused on the theory of tropical development for the Japanese colonial government. Instead of approaching this topic with the Capitalism of Sugar Industry, Dr. Chen put Tashiro Yasusada (田代安定) and his development plans at the center of his discussion.

Tashiro Yasusada was a Japanese botanist and technocrat. He filled his life with eventful traveling experiences. Because of his talent for French, an official diplomatic language in the 19th century, he was appointed to be an administrative official representing Japan for the Garden Festival in 1884. This junior official hence went to St. Petersburg, where the international fair was held and seized a great opportunity to observe horticulture and cultivation methods of tropical plants in Belgium, France, and Germany. After that, he traveled to many islands in the Pacific Ocean with the Japanese Navy and did research surveys around the world for several governmental agencies and institutions. With abundant traveling experiences and observations, he proposed a development plan for the Yaeyama Islands(八重山群島), which goal was to transform these islands into an area matching the Japanese imagination and economic needs of tropics.

The government did not accept his meticulous plan for Yaeyama Islands. However, he was able to partially implement his proposal in Taiwan. He came to Taiwan in 1895, a year when Japan received this island from the Qing Empire as compensation for the Sino-Japanese War. He proposed two plans on the basis of his worldwide surveys and investigation of places in Taiwan such as Yilan (宜蘭), Taidong (臺東), and Orchid island. The Government-General of Taiwan adopted one of his plans and established an experimental plantation for tropical plants in Hengchun (恆春). On the plantation, indigenous people from Paiwan tribe were hired to grow various plants that originated from any other tropical areas and had economic values and pragmatic functions.

Tashiro Yasusada contributed to the construction of botanical knowledge in Taiwan. Even though Tashiro Yasusada passed away in 1928, his surveys and development plan built a basis for the knowledge construction of Taiwan and the theory of tropical development for the colonial government. Under his guidance, Taiwan, dissimilar to tropical islands in the Pacific Ocean in the eyes of the Japanese, was “tropicalized” and converted into a tropical Neverland for the Japanese Empire.

Extra sources:

 

Report on 2021 EHLecture (1) 2021/3/5
Report by Lin, Yu-hsuan, assistant of the Environmental History Group in the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

Horticulture and the Creation of Tropical Taiwan

The first EH lecture in 2021 was given by Lu Shao Li 呂紹理 (professor in the Department of History, National Taiwan University, and joint faculty in the Institute of Taiwan History). While being a versatile researcher who has been dedicated to the socio-cultural and environmental history of Taiwan, he is now concentrating on the formation of Horticulture and tropical images during the Japanese colonial period. From last year, he has shown his ongoing study on three different occasions, where provided incentive for a new research topic. The topic of this lecture was inspired by a question given by researchers in the Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica while presenting his latest research last November: Why did Japanese colonizers introduce tropical plants to Taiwan while Taiwan is manifestly a tropical island?

Professor Lu took his first step on the invention of tropics. He argued that the records and itineraries showing the huge discrepancy of people, climate and lifestyle between Europe and the new-found lands is the origin of tropics as a biogeographical concept; however, the title of the “inventor” of tropics can be given to naturalist Alexander von Humboldt(1769-1859). He proposed an unprecedented concept called vegetation, a term that shows that plants have a spatial affiliation with climate, altitude and resources of the environment they grow. While seeing some plants grow in a similar condition, forming a vegetation of a specific area which can be demarcated by altitude and latitude, Humboldt divided the earth into different climate zones, such as the torrid zone and temperate zone. The following scholars classified plant species on the basis of their spatial distribution, which can be grouped into one zone. These intellectuals and their work not only challenged the Weltanschauung(worldview) of Christianity but also stimulated discussions on unfamiliar lands, especially tropics.

This trend soon hit Japan. In the second half of the nineteenth century, books about tropics were translated into Japanese, and their publishing market achieved rapid growth during 1930-40s. These books provided Japanese images of tropics with a western perception, which was later adopted by Japanese education system and passed to their students. Meanwhile, the Japanese government followed the steps of the western colonizers, sending some naturalists with expedition teams to investigate the “unknown” lands. Tashiro Yasusada(田代安定), a botanist who later became one of the most influential technicians in Taiwan, took the opportunity to investigate plants in many places, such as Samoan Islands and Hawaii. However, not until Japan ruled Taiwan, did Japanese profoundly experience what was called “tropics”.

Taiwan was the best research object for Japanese scholars. Two investigating groups led by Honda Seiroku(本多静六) and Owatari Chutaro(大渡忠太郎) came up with discrepant views towards a simple but significant question:  is Taiwan  a tropical island? Owatari Chutaro argued that Taiwan lacked some essential elements of being a tropical island, such as Cocos nucifera. Honda Seiroku had an opposite opinion, and criticized  Owatari’s investigation for ignoring the effect of altitude on plants. The dualistic opinions towards Taiwan encouraged agricultural technicians, especially Tashiro Yasusada, to introduce plants from tropical areas dominated by western colonizers to this island, which was also considered as a greenhouse suitable for cultivation experiment. This action is for the purpose of making Taiwan a more tropical-like colony, similar to those European counterparts in Southeast Asia, Africa and South America. Horticulture, as a way to grow tropical plants, was rapidly developed in Taiwan.

The study of Horticulture and tropical images is still an ongoing project. Professor Lu holds an idea that the image of tropics and the junction of tropics and “south” should be problematized. As he observed, those Japanese Horticulturalists surprisingly had no discussion on what a tropical island should be while making the utmost effort on building the tropical landscape in Taiwan. This manifested that, for the Japanese, the meaning of tropics was implicit and waiting to be spelled out literally or scientifically. The fact that people usually view the south as the torrid zone has correspondence with the view of those technicians. Professor Lu clarified that books with the keywords “Nanyang(南洋)” and “south(南方)” actually appeared earlier than those with “tropics(熱帶)”, indicating a process of integration of two different concepts. He argued that only if we know how the tropics were “tropicalized”, can we have a better understanding of the tropical image of Taiwan.

Book Recommendations:

  1. Nancy Leys Stepan, Picturing Tropical Nature, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2001.
  2. David John Arnold, The Tropics and the Traveling Gaze: India, Landscape, and Science, 1800-1856, Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2014.
  3. Janet Browne, The Secular Ark: Studies in the History of Biogeography, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.
  4. 陳偉智,〈田代安定:博物學、田野技藝與殖民發展論〉,國立臺灣大學歷史學系博士論文,2020。

 

Report on 2020 EHLecture (5) 2020/11/3
Report by Lin, Yu-hsuan, assistant of the Environmental History Group in the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

Research on the Introduction of Apple Snails to Taiwan

In the last lecture this year, we are honored to invite Yan-ling Tsai (蔡晏霖), associate professor from Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Graduate Program of Ethnicity and Culture in National Chiao Tung University. Professor Tsai devotes herself to the farms in Yilan (宜蘭), and studied the problems with which farmers have been struggling for a long time. The most notorious problem that has bothered farmers since the 1980s is the invasion of apple snails (福壽螺). 

Apple snails came to Taiwan from Argentina around 1979-80. They quickly accommodated themselves to their new home and increased gradually in number in rice fields with their astonishing living skills, which allow them to live in a variable environment. Their enormous appetite for rice stems reduces the harvest from rice fields, turning them into the most fearsome enemies to the farmers. They even became the most infamous introduced species that should be eliminated from Taiwan at the appeal of the government, which put lots of efforts on the prevention of apple snails while condemning those who released this terrifying creature to the wild. 

Rather than speaking in a tone of condemnation, Professor Tsai pays attention to the social contexts that introduced apple snails as food to Taiwan and made them problematic. She pointed out that there was a trend of introducing exotic species to Taiwan in the 1970-80s, a time of the Cold War in which they were easier to be smuggled to Taiwan as a result from the ignorance of the government. Members of “China Technical Mission” (農技團), immigrants to Latin America during the 1970s and the farmers who suffered from the decline of agriculture played a key role in the introduction of exotic species. They found benefits from snail breeding as well as farming, and hence gave themselves over to introducing or breeding different exotic snails. Apple snails were one of them, and soon considered as the most profitable product in the breeding market due to the low breeding cost.

This breeding trend of apple snails could also be seen in other countries. In Japan, apple snails were given a lovely name “夢貝”, which means the dreamed shellfish, in the newspaper advertisement. In contrast, apple snails were not promoted by businessmen, but by the government in the Philippines. Despite lack of explicit evidence, it is said that Imelda Marcos, the First Lady of the Philippines at that time, encouraged snail farming in order to provide more protein to her people. With the support from the government, apple snails spread from the countries to the cities with the name of “the miracle snails,” and were viewed as an achievement of agricultural modernization by Filipinos. 

However, the popularity of apple snails did not last long in Taiwan. Before the consumption market of apple snails was developed, these small creatures were found to be a hazard to rice fields. Apple snails were depicted as an animal with flagrance by the government and media, eliminating their glamorous looks and great worth in the breeding market. The collapse of the breeding market caused a more serious problem: the frightened farmers threw away their snails to avoid losing more money and being condemned. Professor Tsai called this phenomenon the failure of domestication in species and capital absorption in the world of agrarian capitalism.

Professor Tsai tried to propose a possible solution for this problem. Instead of urging to wipe out apple snails by pesticides, which destroys the ecosystem in rice fields, she advocated that farmers can reduce the number of apple snails by changing the way of growing rice. She showed that the adoption of the direct seeding in growing rice in Japan and the Philippines limits the number of apple snails. Besides, she also appealed to a deeper understanding of the intrusion of apple snails to replace the meaningless condemnation that no one can learn a lesson from the past. Being inspired by Paul Robbins’ thought-provoking research about ecological intervention, she suggested that we had better to clarify our demand for rice production and ecology by knowing how apple snails provoked the recombination of multi-species in rice fields, and with the basis of that, we will be able to live in peace with apple snails.

Professor Tsai’s fascinating lecture raised interest for the audience about knowing more details of this topic. For instance, discussant Yu-Ju Chien (簡妤儒), assistant professor from Department of Sociology in National Taiwan University, wanted to know why the consumer market was not fully developed at that time. Pin-Tsang Tseng (曾品滄), associate research fellow in Institute of Taiwan History wondered if apple snails truly taste bad, which impacted the consumer market. Moreover, he questioned if it is appropriate to connect the Cold War and the introduction of exotic species. 

Professor Tsai clarified that the taste of apple snails is actually not bad, which is quite different from the general opinion. Hence, the reason why the consumer market was underdeveloped is not the bad taste of apple snails, but the profitability of the breeding market that attracted those who were involved in snail farming. And in the Cold War, the government concentrated on the control of people more than exotic animals or plants, giving an opportunity for those who were able to travel abroad to introduce species other than those in Taiwan.

Paul F Robbins, “No Going Back: The Political Ethics of Ecological Novelty”, in Kohei Okamoto and Yoshitaka Ishikawa ed. Traditional Wisdom and Modern Knowledge for the Earth’s Future: Lectures Given at the Plenary Sessions of the International Geographical Union Kyoto Regional (Japan: Springer Verlag, 2013), pp.103-118.

Paul F Robbins, “Comparing Invasive Networks: Cultural and Political Biographies of Invasive Species” in Geographical Review (2004), 94(2), pp. 139-156.

 

Report on 2020 EHLecture (4) 2020/10/6
Report by Lin, Yu-hsuan, assistant of the Environmental History Group in the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

The fourth lecture was given by Tong-hong Huang (黃同弘). Mr. Huang has been investigating aerial photographs for several years, and already published two books relevant to this topic. He started his research career from the study of aerial photographs taken by the United States Armed Forces during World War II for military purposes. These photos caught his attention, and dragged him into the stories told by lines and color lumps on the image. 

He pointed out that aerial photography is a combination of aviation, photography and survey. These photos are not only a beautiful art craft that show an aerial view of the landscape constructed by nature and humans, but also a scientific tool for survey of geography, agriculture and forestry. They carry large amounts of information, and can be considered as materials for historical and humanistic research. For instance, a trained researcher is able to figure out the location and amount of aboriginal villages revealed in the photos, tell their changes by overlay analysis, and provide an interpretation of the change that cannot be seen in documents or archives. 

He explained the value of aerial photos. Aerial photos, which provide more direct and objective information, can be beneficial to historical study, especially when written records are absent, when oral records are misguided by people’s memories, and when people’s memories shared within communities vanish. For example, these images offer information of forestry during World War II, when statistical work was hard to be done. Furthermore, aerial photos also offer a more holistic view of lands. In the case of the hydraulic management of the Tamsui River and the Keelung River, residents in Guandu (關渡) and Wugu (五股) believe that the seawater intrusion was caused by widening the Tamsui River in 1964, in spite of a more complex reason given by the government. The aerial photos proved that the inference of the government researchers is correct: the land subsidence of Guandu and Wugu, which was partially caused by the establishment of the Shimen Dam as well as sand and gravel exploitation, led to the seawater intrusion.

Besides the interpretation of aerial photographs, Mr. Huang also concerns the history of technology. The technology of aerial photography in Taiwan was introduced by the United States Armed Forces. In 1952, the Forest Resource & Land Use Survey Team was established by the Sino-American Joint Commission on Rural Reconstruction (農復會). It cooperated with American army to conduct surveys on the forest resources and land use. Since then, it has collected many aerial photos of Taiwan. Nowadays, the team is named the Aerial Survey Office, and under the instruction from the Forestry Bureau (林務局), an agency of the Council of Agriculture (農委會).

Mr. Huang provided some basic tools for finding and utilizing aerial photos. Discussant Hsiung-Ming Liao, an associate research scientist in the Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, suggested that Mr. Huang could instruct people in the interpretation and use of aerial photos. 

Basic tools Mr. Huang recommended:

  1. Google Earth: https://www.google.com.tw/intl/zh-TW/earth/
  2. 美國國家檔案館典藏臺灣舊航空照片 (Aerial photos of Taiwan Collected by the National Archives and Records Administration in the U.S.A.) : https://archives.ith.sinica.edu.tw/acquisition_type_01con.php?no=11 
  3. 臺灣百年歷史地圖 (Historical Maps of Taiwan) : http://gissrv4.sinica.edu.tw/gis/twhgis/
  4. 臺灣水圳文化網 (Maps, Images and Documents of the Irrigation System in Taiwan) : http://gis.rchss.sinica.edu.tw/canal/
  5. 航遙測影像供應平臺 (Aerial Remote Sensing Images of Taiwan) : https://ngis.afasi.gov.tw/
  6. 航攝影像圖資瀏覽服務平臺 (Aerial Photos of Taiwan) : https://image.afasi.gov.tw/
  7. 臺北市歷史圖資展示系統 (WebGIS of the Historical Maps for Taipei City): http://www.historygis.udd.taipei.gov.tw/urban/map/
  8. 中央大學太空及遙測中心 (Center for Space and Remote Sensing Research, National Central University) : https://www.csrsr.ncu.edu.tw/ 
  9. BigGIS_巨量空間資訊系統: https://gis.swcb.gov.tw/
  10. EarthExplorer-USGS: https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/

Books published by Mr. Huang:

  1. 反轉戰爭之眼:從美軍舊航照解讀台灣地景脈絡 (Changing Visions of War: Investigating the Landscape Context in Taiwan by Aerial Photographs from U.S. Armed Force)
  2. 不可見的臺灣:農航影像下的異視界 (Invisible Taiwan: A Fantastic Horizon in Aerial Photographs)

 

Report on 2020 EHLecture (3) 2020/8/4
Report by Lin, Yu-hsuan, assistant of the Environmental History Group in the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

The third lecture was given on August 4th, 2020, by Chia-hsing Ho (侯嘉星), an assistant professor from the Department of History in National Chung Hsing University. It was titled, “Acquisition of Technology and Environmental Development: A Case Study of the Daxueshan Forestry Company”.

Prof. Ho's research focuses on the afforestation and machine industry in China in the first half of the 20th century. He has published two books, “The Afforestation of Nationalist Government of R.O.C. during 1930s: A Focus on the North China Plain” (《1930年代國民政府的造林事業:以華北平原為個案研究》) and “Machinery Industry and Villages in Jiangnan Region: The Transformation of Agriculture and Industry in Modern China, 1920-1950” (《機器業與江南農村:近代中國的農工業轉換1920-1950》). These books interpret the interaction between “tradition” and “modern” in forestry, agriculture and machine industry, looking at economic activities, environmental reconstruction and their impacts. In his research, he found that the policy of integrating agriculture and machinery, which had already appeared in China before World War II, was executed in public-owned factories in Taiwan by the Nationalist government. Based on that, he turned his attention to the Daxueshan Forestry Company, a provincial business founded in November, 1958. 

This forestry company was located in Dongshi (東勢), Taichung. It is a place filled with woodland and there were many factories for wood processing during the Japanese Colonial Period. Besides its Japanese heritage, “Daxueshan” seems more like an American forestry company: not only because its capital was mainly from American aid, but also American machines and trucks were used for cutting and carrying timber. In brief, this forestry business was managed in an American way, which Prof. Ho considered as an influence from the Nationalist government on account of the adoption of American operations of forestry in China. However, the “American style” adopted by the operators from China failed to bring benefits in Taiwan, leading to the end of the company in 1973 due to many operational problems.

Most research on “Daxueshan” uses interviews and official publications. These materials unambiguously tell us the operational problems hidden in the company: (1) the deforestation was so efficient that it drastically raised the cost of tree planting; (2) the machines for wood processing were not meant for coniferous trees in Taiwan, causing enormous waste of wood; (3) there was a lot of “deadwood” in the company, increasing the burden of personnel cost. However, Prof. Ho pointed that these materials did not present the holistic plan of resource exploitation mapped out by the Executive Yuan (行政院) and the Taiwan Provincial Government (臺灣省政府), as well as “the concept of environment” revealed from the plan. 

Prof. Ho mentioned that the archives from the Provincial Government, especially those from the Department of Agriculture and Forestry (農林廳), are significant materials that were rarely used by researchers before. Department of Agriculture and Forestry was the main competent authority managing environmental exploitation and utilization of resources, giving its archives values for being key materials on the research of “Daxueshan”. Although these incredibly helpful materials were collected by different governmental agencies after the provincial government was streamlined, causing difficulty to do research, Prof. Ho still found interesting facts that are able to provide a more holistic image of “Daxueshan”.

Prof. Ho argued that the management and operation of “Daxueshan'' was more complicated than previously thought. There were tensions between different departments of provincial government: the Department of Agriculture and Forestry and the Forestry Bureau (林產管理局) wanted to expand the forestry business in order to gain benefits and to promote other industries around the area, while the Department of Finance had the opposite opinion, and was worried about excessive investment which had emerged when the company was just founded, and would eventually bring it to an end. 

The Executive Yuan also had its own opinions towards environmental exploitation. It acknowledged the importance of water and soil conservation from its experience in China, so it insisted on making a balance between deforestation and afforestation. Previous research of “Daxueshan” usually sees the company’s forestry plan as something great but not appropriate, or criticized the government as a plunderer who seized numerous resources from the forest through “Daxueshan”, but Prof. Ho showed that it is not that simple. The government did value forests and put a lot of effort into afforestation. In contrast to forestry work nowadays, which follows the principle of environmentalism, the government at that time renovated the environment, removed protophyte, and planted trees that were considered to be “useful”. Prof. Ho indicated that the environmental reconstruction under the needs of environmental exploitation was the main principle of forestry operation, and it can be viewed as a concept that derived from the forestry experience that the Nationalist government had in China.

In the last hour of the lecture, discussant Prof. Hong-jin Wang (王鴻濬) from the Department of Public Administration, National Donghwa University, provided more facts of the forestry in Taiwan after World War II, and recommended a book, “Investigation of Forestry in Taiwan” (《臺灣林業考察研究專輯》) , which contained lots of details on the Daxueshan Forestry Company. One of the participants wondered on what level the forestry experience could influence plans and policies of forestry in Taiwan, and questioned if the American technology and knowledge adopted by “Daxueshan” can be seen as an influence from China. In response to these questions, Prof. Ho took road transportation as an example. He said that road transportation had already become the main way to carry wood in southwest China by 1940s, and was directly applied in Taiwan by the officials from Nationalist government instead of the American government or companies. 

 

Report on 2020 EHLecture (2) 2020/6/4
Reported by Lin, Yu-hsuan, assistant of Environmental History Group in the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

Open

 

Report on 2020 EHLecture (1) 2020/2/4
Reported by Yu-hsuan Lin, assistant of environmental history group in the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

Open

 

Report on 2019 EHWorkshop (3) 2019/7/26
Reported by Yawen Ku, Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

Open

 

Report on 2019 EHWorkshop (2) 2019/5/24
Reported by Yawen Ku, Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

Open

 

2019 EHWorkshop (1) 2019/3/22
Report by Yawen Ku, Associate Research Fellow of the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

Open

 

2018 EHWorkshop (3) 2018/10/19
Report by Ts’ui-jung Liu, Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

Open

 

2018 Environmental History Workshop (2) 2018/08/08
Reported by Yawen Ku, Associate Research Fellow of the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

Open

 

Report on 2018EHWorkshop (1) 2018/06/06
Report by Ya-wen Ku 顧雅文, Insitute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

Open

 

Report on EAEH2017, October 26-30, Tianjin, China
By Ts’ui-jung Liu, Academia Sinica. Date: November 2, 2017.

Open

 

Report on the 2017 Third Environmental History Workshop
By Ya-wen Ku, Assistant Research Fellow, Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

Open

 

Report on 2017 EH Workshop (2)-2017/6/16
Reported by
Ya-wen Ku (Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica) and
Marlon Zhu (Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica)

Open

 

2017EHWorkshop-2017/03/17
Report by Ya-wen Ku, Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

Open

 

Report on 2016 EH Workshop (4)
By Ya-wen Ku 顧雅文, Assistant Research Fellow, Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

Open

 

Report on 2016 EH Workshop (3)
By Ya-wen Ku 顧雅文, Assistant Research Fellow, Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

Open

 

Report on 2016 EHWorkshop (2) held on 20 May 2016 at Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sincia
By Ya-wen Ku, Assistant Research Fellow, Institute of Taiwan History

Open

 

Report on 2016 EHWorkshop (1) held on 18 March 2016 at Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica
Reported by
Marlon Zhu (Assistant Research Fellow, Institute of Modern History) and
Ya-wen Ku (Assistant Research Fellow, Institute of Taiwan History)

Open

 

Report on the Third Conference of East Asian Environmental History (EAEH2015)
by Shiyung Liu (Research Fellow, Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica)

Open

 

Report on 2015 EHWorkshop (3), August 28, 2015
Ya-wen Ku (Assistant Research Fellow, Institute of Taiwan History) for the morning session and Pin-tsang Tseng (Assistant Research Fellow, Institute to Taiwan History) for the afternoon session.

Open

 

Report on 2015EHWorkshop (2), May 29, 2015
by Ts’ui-jung Liu, Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

Open

 

Report on the 2015 Environmental History Workshop (1) held at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica (2015/03/20)
By Pin-Tsang Tseng (Assistant Research Fellow, Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica) for the morning section
and Ya-wen Ku (Assistant Research Fellow, Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica) for the afternoon section

Open

 

Report on the 2014 Environmental History Workshop (4) held at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica (2014/11/21)
by Ts’ui-jung Liu, Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica

Open

 

Report on the 2014 Environmental History Workshop (3) held at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica
by Ts’ui-jung Liu, Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica (2014/09/01)

Open

 

Report on “Ethnic and Environmental Change in China’s Southwestern Frontier: A Global Perspective” International Academic Workshop, Yunnan University, 18-20 August, 2014
by Ts’ui-jung Liu, Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica (2014/8/29)

Open

 

A Report on the Second World Congress of Environmental History (WCEH2014)
By Ts’ui-jung Liu, Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica (July 24, 2014)

Open

 

Report on the Second 2014 EH Workshop at Academia Sinica (May 23, 2014)
by Marlon Zhu (Assistant Research Fellow, Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica)

Open

 

Report on the First 2014 EH Workshop at Academia Sinica (February 21, 2014)
by Marlon Zhu (Post-doctoral Fellow, Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica)

Open

 

Report on the Second Conference of East Asian Environmental History (EAEH2013)
by Ya-wen Ku and Marlon Zhu (Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica)

Open

 

Report on the Third 2013 EH Workshop at Academia Sinica (August 23, 2013)
by Marlon Zhu (Post-doctoral Fellow, Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica)

Open

 

Report on the 2013 Second EH Workshop at Academia Sinica (May 24, 2013)
by Marlon Zhu (Post-doctoral Fellow, Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica)

Open

 

Report on the 2013 First EH Workshop at Academia Sinica (February 22, 2013)
by Marlon Zhu (Post-doctoral Fellow, Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica)

Open

 

Report on the 2012 forth EH Workshop at Academia Sinica (November 23, 2012)
By Ts’ui-jung Liu

Open

 

Report on the 2012 3rd EH Workshop at Academia Sinica (August 31, 2012)
by Marlon Zhu (Post-doctoral Fellow, Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica)

Open

 

Brief on the speech at Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica (July 6,2012)

Lecturer: Professor Philip Brown (Department of History, The Ohio State University) CV
Topic: Technology Transfer in Early Twentieth-Century East Asia: Thoughts for a Comparative Research Project
  Abstract Powerpoint Slides

 

Report on the 2012 Second EH Workshop at Academia Sinica (May 25, 2012)
By Marlon Zhu (Ph.D. Candidate, The State University of New York at Binghamton)

Open

 

A Report on the 2012 First EH Workshop at Academia Sinica (February 24th, 2012)
By Marlon Zhu (PhD candidate of History Department, Binghamton University, SUNY)

Open

 

Report on the First Conference of East Asian Environmental History, 2011
By Marlon Zhu (Ph.D. Candidate, BinghamtonUniversity, SUNY; Assistant, Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica)

Open

 

A Report on the Third EH Workshop of 2011 at Academia Sinica (July 22, 2011)
By Ya-wen Ku (Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica) and Marlon Zhu (PhD candidate of History Department, BinghamtonUniversity, SUNY)

Open

 

A Report on the Second EH Workshop of 2011 at Academia Sinica (May 20, 2011)
By Marlon Zhu (PhD candidate of History Department, Binghamton University, SUNY)

Open

 

A Report on the First EH Workshop of 2011 at Academia Sinica (February 18th, 2011)
By Marlon Zhu (PhD candidate of History Department, Binghamton University, SUNY)

Open

 

A report on the fourth EH workshop at Academia Sinica (October 29, 2010)
By Ts'ui-jung Liu

Open

 

Report on the Third EH Workshop at Academia Sinica (July 16, 2010)
By Yi-tze Lee, Dept. of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh; Visiting fellow at the Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica

Open

 

A brief report on the second workshop of environmental history held on April 30, 2010 at Academia Sinica
By Ts'ui-jung Liu

Open

 

A Repot on the First EH Workshop at Academia Sinica
By Yi-tze Lee, Dept. of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh; Visiting fellow at the Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica

Open

 

Brief on WCEH2009 by Ts'ui-jung Liu

Open

 


Copyright © Academia Sinica 2022